Peer Review reports
From: Urethral catheters: can we reduce use?
Original Submission | ||
---|---|---|
30 Aug 2010 | Submitted | Original manuscript |
21 Sep 2010 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter Johannes van den Broek |
Resubmission - Version 2 | ||
21 Sep 2010 | Submitted | Manuscript version 2 |
5 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lindsay Nicolle |
15 Nov 2010 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Stickler |
2 Feb 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victor Kiri |
31 Mar 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter Johannes van den Broek |
Resubmission - Version 3 | ||
31 Mar 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 3 |
20 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Victor Kiri |
22 Apr 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - David Stickler |
5 May 2011 | Reviewed | Reviewer Report - Lindsay Nicolle |
20 May 2011 | Author responded | Author comments - Pieter Johannes van den Broek |
Resubmission - Version 4 | ||
20 May 2011 | Submitted | Manuscript version 4 |
Publishing | ||
23 May 2011 | Editorially accepted | |
23 May 2011 | Article published | 10.1186/1471-2490-11-10 |
You can find further information about peer review here.